Abstract
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE POTENCY OF ANTIMALARIAL DRUGS USED ON MALE AND FEMALE PATIENTS USING BIOASSAY ANALYSIS METHOD
Ucheokoro Adaeze S.*, Ogoke Uchenna P.
ABSTRACT
Background: Bioassay remains essential for evaluating antimalarial drug potency in resource-limited settings,
particularly for Plasmodium malariae infections which contribute significantly to malaria morbidity in sub-Saharan
Africa. Establishing parallelism between dose-response curves is a critical prerequisite for valid relative potency
estimation.
Objective: This study assessed the potency of four generic antimalarial brands (Drugs A, B, C, D) relative to a
standard formulation using clinical recovery time data with gender-stratified analysis.
Methods: An indirect assay design measured time to recovery (hours) post-treatment. Parallelism was tested using
F-test, χ²-test, and equivalence testing via JMP software version 17. A 4-parameter logistic (4PL) model
characterized dose-response relationships. One-way ANOVA assessed formulation variation, with bioequivalence
declared when 90% confidence intervals for growth rate, inflection point, and asymptotes fell within decision
limits.
Results: All formulations demonstrated significant variation (ANOVA p < 0.0001). However, parallelism testing
failed comprehensively: overall F-test (p = 0.0094), χ²-test (p = 0.0001); male patients F-test (p < 0.0001), χ²-test (p
= 0.0001); female patients F-test (p < 0.0001), χ²-test (p = 0.0001). Equivalence testing confirmed non-equivalence
across all drugs versus standard for all 4PL parameters in both genders. Graphical analysis revealed inconsistent
logarithmic dose spacing and variable horizontal shifts (Δ), violating parallelism assumptions.
Conclusion: The consistent failure of parallelism testing across all analyses prevented relative potency estimation,
indicating potential degradation of the reference standard, formulation inconsistencies, or assay design flaws. This
underscores the critical importance of parallelism validation in bioassays and highlights methodological challenges
in antimalarial potency assessment.
WJPLS CITATION 
| All | Since 2020 | |
| Citation | 590 | 424 |
| h-index | 12 | 10 |
| i10-index | 17 | 14 |
INDEXING
NEWS & UPDATION
BEST ARTICLE AWARDS
World Journal of Pharmaceutical and life sciences is giving Best Article Award in every Issue for Best Article and Issue Certificate of Appreciation to the Authors to promote research activity of scholar.
Best Article of current issue
Download Article : Click here



